Do I Have to Get a Truck Accident Attorney?

Is there a difference between a regular car accident attorney and a truck accident attorney? They’re both road accidents so surely, the more generalized attorney services can save a lot of money for doing the same thing, right?

This is a common misconception.

There is a very big difference between a car accident and a truck accident—literally. A car, on average, can weigh around 3,000 pounds. If you push it, it can go up to maybe 10,000 pounds for a significantly large car with a lot of cargo on it. An eighteen wheeler truck, however, can go up to 80,000 pounds without permit. Can you imagine the sheer mass of a vehicle that large? And if you can, can you compare the damage that one car could do in contrast to an eighteen wheeler?

Something that not a lot of civilians know is that there is a significant set of restrictions and laws that hold truck driving and truck accidents in a different category. An Atlanta trucking accidents attorney would point out how truck drivers not only have to be professionally licensed drivers but they are also only allowed to drive for a maximum for fourteen hours per day. Some might say that a fatigued driver is almost as bad as a drunk driver – and the result of an unfocused driver could prove to be catastrophic.

Can you imagine the damage that a truck could do to lanes and lanes of gridlocked traffic in contrast to a single car? The risk is greater with trucks, henceforth there are stricter boundaries and laws about it. It’s not something your regular car accident attorney is familiar with on a daily basis.

Is Investing in Content Writing Worth the Money?

It can be argued that the newspaper is a dying media platform. More and more people are skipping the book to wait for the movie. Audiences are content with 140-characters as their only news source for the day. This is an easy assumption to make – on a surface level, it’s true. So is it still worth it to invest money on content writing?

Well, put it like this. You can invest a lot of money into making sure that your company’s website is accessible and aesthetically pleasing. You want your company to be playing in the same leagues as your competitor – performing preferably better than your competitor, even. But without content writing – you’ve basically got a sandwich that’s just bread. The content writing is responsible for creating the meat that makes your website and online brand actually mean something.

Audiences these days dislike the old method of just being told something and expected to believe it. They want reasons and arguments as to why they should believe anything your company says. It’s a hypercritical age and the person who has all the answers has the power. That is why it is essential to first build that trust through conversation – and that’s where modern SEO (Search Engine Optimization) content comes through.

Creating content that both inspires and retains conversation and interest is how you build a loyal clientele who will frequently look to you for not just answers but also ideas. Without accessible content, according to the people with Kinetic Word, your website can get new clicks every single day but no new customers. Anyone can buy clicks but it takes talent, planning, and dedication to build a reputation.

So, coming back to the question: is investing in content writing still worth the money? Given all the reasons stated above, the answer should be pretty obvious, but in the end – it’s still your decision.

Preventing Car Accidents Caused by Drunk Driving

Driving will always involve significant risks. As the lawyers of Pohl & Berk LLP have said on their website, vehicular accidents are one of the most common causes of injury and death in the country. Because of this, drivers are enjoined to keep the roads safe by practicing prescribed safety measure. Through everyone’s best efforts, we can help curb the alarming number of cases in the U.S.

Unfortunately, there are moments when such precautions are completely ignored by reckless individuals. People who insist on driving even when they are drunk are causing preventable accidents that often lead to devastating outcomes.

As gathered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, alcohol-impaired driving has caused more than 10,000 deaths in the year 2012. While there are certain laws and policies in place to prevent such fatalities from occurring again and again, alcohol impaired-driving remains a pressing issue that needs to be prioritized and solved.

Thankfully, the recent years saw significant strides in punishing incidents of driving while under the influence (DUI) and driving while intoxicated (DWI). For one, several states have implemented stricter policies to make sure perpetrators are immediately apprehended on the road. Among these policies are sobriety checkpoints, where officers check for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels in drivers. Across the country, 0.08 percent is the legal BAC level for private individuals. Commercial drivers are limited to 0.04 percent. Meanwhile, individuals under the age of 21 should not be caught driving with any trace of alcohol at all. Another of the government’s efforts is the increase of police visibility during holidays and other big events when alcohol-impaired driving will usually spike. While penalties may differ in certain areas, DUI and DWI offenses can be serious. First time offenders might get their licenses suspended.

Drunk driving can only be prevented if individuals are willing to be accountable and take responsibility for their actions. A personal injury lawyer in Tennessee will probably inform you that if you have been injured by someone who was driving while intoxicated or under the influence, you can take legal action to ensure swift justice and just compensation. Because penalties and regulations differ from state to state, the options you have will depend on the area you’re in.

Complications Associated with Bone Fractures

Bone fractures sound painful, but most people do not consider them dangerous. In general, bone fractures do heal with little or no trouble when treated properly although it can be uncomfortable and inconvenient, depending on the area involved.

However, complications can occur, especially with traumatic fractures which result from sudden and forceful collision with a hard object such as the ground or vehicle, physical altercation, or other stressful forces. One of these is infections.

There are two broad types of bone fractures: open and closed. Traumatic fractures are often open fractures because an external force is brought to bear upon the bone, often involving soft tissue damage and skin rupture. According to the website from Williams Kherkher Law Firm, open fractures can easily become infected, leading to adult respiratory distress syndrome. Moreover, open fractures can also mean considerable blood loss, which can cause the patient to go into hypovolaemic shock.

Another complication associated with traumatic fractures to long bones is fat embolism syndrome, which develops shortly after the event and is nearly always fatal although it is asymptomatic. Damage to the joints, muscle, blood vessels and soft tissue are also common and problematic, although not usually fatal except when the event involves crushing skeletal muscle injury, which can lead to Bywaters’ syndrome. Prolonged inactivity due to multiple traumatic fractures may also lead to deep vein thrombosis.

Bone fractures can lead to serious medical and health problems even with proper care. The potential for complications increases with age and comorbid medical conditions, although traumatic fractures can have grave consequences to anyone, depending on the type, location and severity of the fracture. If you or a family member sustained one or more bone fractures as a result of the negligent act of a third party, compensation may be forthcoming. Consult with a bone fracture lawyer in your area to get an accurate assessment of your legal options.

Heart Attack: A Proven Risk Avandia and Avandia-containing Drugs

There are hundreds of medications against which the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a Black Box Warning – the strongest warning that this branch of US government can issue due to the drugs’ proven life-threatening effects. One of the drugs that have been issued this particular warning is Avandia, also known as Rosiglitazone, which the FDA approved in 1999 and which was once GlaxoSmithKline’s (formerly SmithKlineBeecham Corporation, before its merger with Glaxo Wellcome) second most sold product.

Avandia or Rosiglitazone is recommended to patients suffering from Type II diabetes, a chronic illness wherein the body fails to control the level of sugar in the blood; this sugar, or glucose, is the body’s key source of energy. Glaxo has also produced Avandia in combination with other drugs. Thus, there is Avandaryl, where Rosiglitazone is combined with glimepiride, and Avandamet, the combination of Rosiglitazone and metformin.

Due to the risk of serious side-effects, specifically heart diseases that can lead to death, the FDA, in February of 2011, required the inclusion of the cardiovascular risks and risk of heart attack on the drug’s patient Medication Guide and physician labeling. This was actually preceded by the agency’s announcement in September 2010 that it will strictly restrict the prescription and use of the drug (and all Avandia–containing drugs) by Type 2 diabetes patients.

The known minor and life-threatening side-effects related to Avandia are back pain, blurred vision, osteoporosis, severe allergic reaction, bone fractures, hyperflycemia, myocardial ischemia, stroke and heart attack.

The National Injury Law Center, which continues to answer hundreds of patients with their questions on bad medications and harmful medical procedures, as well as help them in their legal actions against manufacturers or liable individuals, states in an article posted in their website that fluid retention, which can very well result or aggravate congestive heart failure (wherein the heart fails to supply sufficient blood to different body parts), is another severe effect of Rosiglitazone.

Glaxo’s decision not to warn the public of Avandia’s side-effects, due mainly to its contention that its product does not increase risk of heart attack, is a clear indication of negligence. This is enough to hold the company fully accountable to all the severe effects and deaths caused by Avandia.