There are hundreds of medications against which the US Food and Drug Administration has issued a Black Box Warning – the strongest warning that this branch of US government can issue due to the drugs’ proven life-threatening effects. One of the drugs that have been issued this particular warning is Avandia, also known as Rosiglitazone, which the FDA approved in 1999 and which was once GlaxoSmithKline’s (formerly SmithKlineBeecham Corporation, before its merger with Glaxo Wellcome) second most sold product.
Avandia or Rosiglitazone is recommended to patients suffering from Type II diabetes, a chronic illness wherein the body fails to control the level of sugar in the blood; this sugar, or glucose, is the body’s key source of energy. Glaxo has also produced Avandia in combination with other drugs. Thus, there is Avandaryl, where Rosiglitazone is combined with glimepiride, and Avandamet, the combination of Rosiglitazone and metformin.
Due to the risk of serious side-effects, specifically heart diseases that can lead to death, the FDA, in February of 2011, required the inclusion of the cardiovascular risks and risk of heart attack on the drug’s patient Medication Guide and physician labeling. This was actually preceded by the agency’s announcement in September 2010 that it will strictly restrict the prescription and use of the drug (and all Avandia–containing drugs) by Type 2 diabetes patients.
The known minor and life-threatening side-effects related to Avandia are back pain, blurred vision, osteoporosis, severe allergic reaction, bone fractures, hyperflycemia, myocardial ischemia, stroke and heart attack.
The National Injury Law Center, which continues to answer hundreds of patients with their questions on bad medications and harmful medical procedures, as well as help them in their legal actions against manufacturers or liable individuals, states in an article posted in their website that fluid retention, which can very well result or aggravate congestive heart failure (wherein the heart fails to supply sufficient blood to different body parts), is another severe effect of Rosiglitazone.
Glaxo’s decision not to warn the public of Avandia’s side-effects, due mainly to its contention that its product does not increase risk of heart attack, is a clear indication of negligence. This is enough to hold the company fully accountable to all the severe effects and deaths caused by Avandia.
The four story building sat in a gutted state, right next to a Salvation Army thrift store location. When it collapsed at around 10:45, it fell into the thrift store, killing some of the people inside.
Fire fighters worked through the night to pull up debris and search for survivors in the wreckage. Their efforts uncovered what is believed to be the last missing person from the collapse a few minutes before midnight.
Philadelphia residents claim the work being done on the abandoned building was poor, but did not appear to be in violation of any building codes. The collapse is also being investigated by the Occupation Safety and Health Administration.
Trucks have an obligation to secure their cargo in a way the prevents it from being dislodged or being flung out and causing damage to other vehicles or becoming roadway hazards that can result in serious car accidents.
However, sometimes trucks have signs posted on their rears that caution drivers to keep their distance while claiming they are not responsible for damage to other cars caused by debris falling from their cargo loads. Can they actually absolve themselves from liability by simply stating they aren’t responsible for the damage they cause?
Put bluntly, no, they cannot. It is a trucker’s legal obligation to secure his or her cargo in a way that will prevent debris from leaving the hold. Even dump trucks that are hauling rocks should be adequately covered by a tarp of some kind to keep debris from escaping and damaging other vehicles. Stating they are not responsible for their failure to secure their cargo does not mean they are legally removed from their obligation to secure their load.
If your vehicle was damaged by debris flying from a truck, the truck’s owner is responsible for the damage, regardless of any signage that might be on the vehicle. Nevertheless, keeping distance from these trucks is a good practice since it reduces the risk that something will actually hit your car.
Last month, a gigantic explosion rocked the small town of West, Texas. A local fertilizer plant blew up, killing 14 people. Hundreds were injured as the force of the blast destroyed homes. The explosion left behind a 90-foot-wide crater and could be felt as far away as Dallas.
New insights into the blast’s nature indicate that it might have been the result of ammonium nitrate that was ignited by a fire that was raging at the plant when the explosion occurred. Ammonium nitrate has nitrogen ions that are easily absorbed by plants as nutrients, but the substance is also commonly used as an ingredient in explosives.
Ammonium nitrate does not blow up on its own and typically has to be exposed to some other chemical for a reaction to occur. Due to what appears to be a combination of poor record keeping and lax regulation, investigators are unsure how much ammonium nitrate was present on the site.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has been giving displaced citizens hotel vouchers, but the town will have to wait a little longer for answers into exactly what happened.
One of the most important aspects of a legal case is the ability of either side to prove its points. The only way to really do this with the level of certainty required by the court is to provide evidence that supports the claims you are making.
Just about anything can be evidence as long as it follows certain rules of admissibility set out by federal or state law.
Evidence can fall into four categories. Real evidence is any physical object that is directly involved with the case, such as a murder weapon. Documentary evidence, which is a kind of real evidence, is a document that contains relevant information about the case, such as a business contract in a contract dispute. Demonstrative evidence is something created for the case to help better illustrate the facts to the jury, such as a chart that shows a person’s spending in a bankruptcy suit. Lastly, testimonial evidence is the words of someone who has some kind of special knowledge about the case, such as witnesses of a crime or experts in certain fields whose opinions can clear up misconceptions.
Using abundant evidence to support your case while hampering the opposing side’s is crucial to a successful lawsuit.
The aftermath of an automobile accident can leave you shaking, stressed out, and sacred. Not only are you concerned with your own safety, but also the safety of anyone else in your vehicle and the driver of the other car. And while the moments following an accident may seem like a blur, it is important that you focus, stay calm, and respond appropriately.
By having a plan and knowing how to respond after an accident, you can avoid a number of potentially serious mistakes that could hurt your chances of recovering financial compensation from your insurance company or the other driver’s insurance company through a civil lawsuit.
If you are involved in a car accident, you should respond the following way:
By following these simple steps you can be proactive in getting the financial compensation you need to pay for car repair bills and medical expenses.
A medical malpractice case has made its way to the Supreme Court, and the outcome of the case could have substantial implications for medical malpractice victims’ ability to receive the compensation they are owed following a successful settlement of their case. The case involves Emily Armstrong and her parents, who successfully sued the doctor who delivered Emily and the institution at which he worked for medical malpractice after a difficult delivery left Emily with a debilitating case of cerebral palsy. The doctor had a history of prescription-drug abuse, and he was forced to surrender his license mere months after the botched delivery occurred.
As a result of the injuries sustained during childbirth, Emily was rendered unable to walk, talk, see, or speak, and state officials estimate that nearly $2 million has already been spent in state Medicaid funds in order to provide her with the care she needs. As a result, the state placed a lien on a portion of the malpractice settlement in order to recoup some of the costs of its care. However, the family is challenging the legality of this law, claiming that it conflicts with federal laws prohibiting states from placing liens on the property of Medicaid beneficiaries for their care.
The family has hired a medical malpractice attorney with experience at the state level, and the case will soon be decided by the Court. The outcome could have substantial consequences for the ability of families throughout the country to receive the full amounts of settlements decided by state courts.
The aftermath of a car accident can leave you with a number of physical and emotional injuries, but it can also cause serious financial damage. Depending on the severity of your accident, you may be facing vehicle repair bills, medical expenses, lost wages, and a number of other expenses. These can quickly add up and may cause serious financial struggle and even bankruptcy.
Following an accident, you make a number of calls. Along with calling emergency crews, your family and friends, and possibly even a personal injury lawyer, you will also have to call your insurance company to file an accident report. Dealing with all of these individuals can be a very complicated and stressful time, especially if you have never been in an accident before.
You need to contact your insurance company so you can recover financial benefits to help pay for the damages you suffer as a result of your accident. Before speaking with your insurance company, it is important that you know what you should and should not say to your insurance company to increase your chances at recovering financial benefits.
When speaking with your insurance agent, avoid the following phrases:
If you have been injured in an accident due to someone else’s reckless actions, you may want to take legal action and file a civil lawsuit against the responsible party so you can recover financial compensation. When looking for the right attorney for your case, you should make sure to ask him or her questions to determine whether or not he or she is the right lawyer for your case.
The initial consultation is very important for your case and not only determines whether or not you have a case at all, but whether or not you should pursue a lawsuit with this specific injury lawyer. When meeting with your potential attorney, it is important that you aren’t afraid to ask questions along the way.
The questions you should ask during your consultation cover a number of areas such as the lawyer’s experience, background, and fees. Some questions you should make sure to ask include the following:
Along with looking over your résumé, cover letter, transcripts, and even conducting a face-to-face interview, a number of law firms and other corporations use psychometric testing to determine the aptitude and personality traits of a potential candidate to determine how well he or she will fit at the company. And while a large majority of corporations around the country use psychometric testing, there is still a debate as to whether or not these tests are accurate judgments on one’s character and ability to complete a job.
There are both advantages and disadvantages of psychometric testing. Some advantages of these tests include the following:
There are also disadvantages. This includes the following:
If you are a law student and have to take a psychometric test when applying for a job, make sure you prepare accordingly to give yourself the best chance at success; however, you should also remember that if you don’t do well on the test, it may also mean that a job wasn’t right for you so don’t lose hope.